Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Antminer E9 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Specification | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 34.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3,680.0 MH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 52.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 597,826.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 9,400.0 kg | Weight | 14.2 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 40/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)
Antminer E9 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (52.9 vs 597,826.1 J/TH). The Antminer E9 Pro holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and Antminer E9 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 923813% more hashrate (34.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 18% better power draw (1,800 vs 2,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 100% better efficacité (52.9 vs 597,826.1 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (9,400.0 vs 14.2 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 22% more heat output (6,142 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 43% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 40.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Metric | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $2,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,000 |
| -$3.10 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$3,230 | Net after 1 year | -$4,927 |
| -$4,360 | Net after 2 years | -$6,854 |
| -$5,490 | Net after 3 years | -$8,781 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)52.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) or the Antminer E9 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) is more profitable at $-3.10/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) or the Antminer E9 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) or Antminer E9 Pro?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and Antminer E9 Pro?
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) runs at 52.9 J/TH while the Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH — a difference of 597,773.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (52.9 vs 597,826.1 J/TH).