Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs iBeLink DSM6T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Specification | iBeLink DSM6T |
|---|---|---|
| 34.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Consommation électrique | 2,100 W |
| 52.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 350.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,400.0 kg | Weight | 17,600.0 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,165 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithme | Blake256r14 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)
iBeLink DSM6T
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 85% better efficacité (52.9 vs 350.0 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and iBeLink DSM6T actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 467% more hashrate (34.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 14% better power draw (1,800 vs 2,100 W)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 85% better efficacité (52.9 vs 350.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 47% better weight (9,400 vs 17,600 kg)
- iBeLink DSM6T 17% more heat output (6,142 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 8% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Metric | iBeLink DSM6T |
|---|---|---|
| $2,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.10 | Daily net profit | -$4.82 |
| -$3,230 | Net after 1 year | -$1,761 |
| -$4,360 | Net after 2 years | -$3,521 |
| -$5,490 | Net after 3 years | -$5,282 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)52.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs iBeLink DSM6T: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) is more profitable at $-3.10/day compared to $-4.82/day for the iBeLink DSM6T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) or the iBeLink DSM6T better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs iBeLink DSM6T: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink DSM6T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs iBeLink DSM6T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) runs at 52.9 J/TH while the iBeLink DSM6T runs at 350.0 J/TH — a difference of 297.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (52.9 vs 350.0 J/TH).
