Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 MH/s |
| 2,470 W | Consommation électrique | 240 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 800,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 2,100.0 kg |
| 8,428 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh)
iPollo V1 Mini
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 3067% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Mini claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 3067% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini 90% better power draw (2,470 vs 240 W)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 68% better efficacité (260,000 vs 800,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 99% better weight (14.2 vs 2,100.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 929% more heat output (8,428 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 29% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| $1,902 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $300 |
| -$5.93 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$4,066 | Net after 1 year | -$510 |
| -$6,229 | Net after 2 years | -$720 |
| -$8,393 | Net after 3 years | -$931 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh)Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh)260,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) or the iPollo V1 Mini?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-5.93/day for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 540,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (260,000 vs 800,000 J/TH).