Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 260.0 MH/s |
| 2,340 W | Consommation électrique | 220 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 846,153.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 2.1 kg |
| 7,984 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 3362% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)'s favour. That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 3362% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 91% better power draw (2,340 vs 220 W)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 69% better efficacité (260,000 vs 846,154 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 85% better weight (14.2 vs 2.1 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 964% more heat output (7,984 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 65% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $650 |
| -$5.62 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$7,449 | Net after 1 year | -$843 |
| -$9,498 | Net after 2 years | -$1,035 |
| -$11,548 | Net after 3 years | -$1,228 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)260,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-5.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 runs at 846,153.9 J/TH — a difference of 586,153.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (260,000 vs 846,154 J/TH).