Bitmain Antminer G2 vs iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer G2 | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 220.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 280.0 MH/s |
| 1,200 W | Consommation électrique | 240 W |
| 5,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 857,142.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15,000.0 kg | Weight | 1,000.0 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer G2
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus edges it: 2 of 2 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 84% better efficacité (5,454,545 vs 857,143 J/TH) in the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer G2 and iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus 27% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus 80% better power draw (1,200 vs 240 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus 84% better efficacité (5,454,545 vs 857,143 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus 93% better weight (15,000 vs 1,000 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer G2 400% more heat output (4,094 vs 819 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer G2 | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $369 |
| -$2.88 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$1,051 | Net after 1 year | -$579 |
| -$2,102 | Net after 2 years | -$789 |
| -$3,154 | Net after 3 years | -$1,000 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus857,142.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer G2 or iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Bitmain Antminer G2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer G2 or iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer G2 or the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer G2 and iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer G2 runs at 5,454,545.5 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus runs at 857,142.9 J/TH — a difference of 4,597,402.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficacité (5,454,545 vs 857,143 J/TH).