Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 63.5 TH/s |
| 2,813 W | Consommation électrique | 3,080 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 48.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | — |
| 9,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,509 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)
Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 9% more hashrate (58.0 vs 63.5 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) and Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) 9% more hashrate (58.0 vs 63.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 9% better power draw (2,813 vs 3,080 W)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) 9% more heat output (9,598 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,860 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,860 |
| -$4.66 | Daily net profit | -$5.11 |
| -$3,562 | Net after 1 year | -$3,724 |
| -$5,264 | Net after 2 years | -$5,588 |
| -$6,966 | Net after 3 years | -$7,451 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
TieBoth miners have comparable efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) is more profitable at $-4.66/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) or Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th)?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) and Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer K7 (63.5Th) runs at 48.5 J/TH — a difference of 0.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.