Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) vs Goldshell KD Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) | Specification | Goldshell KD Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 166.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.2 TH/s |
| 3,154 W | Consommation électrique | 1,330 W |
| 19.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 82.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16,100.0 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 10,761 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,538 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithme | Blake2s |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)
Goldshell KD Lite
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 925% more hashrate (166.0 vs 16.2 TH/s). The Goldshell KD Lite holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) and Goldshell KD Lite sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) 925% more hashrate (166.0 vs 16.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD Lite 58% better power draw (3,154 vs 1,330 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) 77% better efficacité (19.0 vs 82.1 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD Lite 50% better weight (16,100 vs 8,100 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) 137% more heat output (10,761 vs 4,538 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD Lite 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) | Metric | Goldshell KD Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $1,399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $839 |
| -$1.70 | Daily net profit | -$2.62 |
| -$2,018 | Net after 1 year | -$1,795 |
| -$2,636 | Net after 2 years | -$2,751 |
| -$3,255 | Net after 3 years | -$3,706 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD LiteScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)19.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) or Goldshell KD Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) is more profitable at $-1.70/day compared to $-2.62/day for the Goldshell KD Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) vs Goldshell KD Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) or the Goldshell KD Lite?
The Goldshell KD Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) vs Goldshell KD Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer KA3 (166Th) runs at 19.0 J/TH while the Goldshell KD Lite runs at 82.1 J/TH — a difference of 63.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (19.0 vs 82.1 J/TH).