Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 9.5 GH/s |
| 3,680 W | Consommation électrique | 3,425 W |
| 184,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 360,526.3 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 15,000.0 kg |
| 12,556 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,686 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 111% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) and Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 111% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 7% better power draw (3,680 vs 3,425 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 49% better efficacité (184,000 vs 360,526 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 7% more heat output (12,556 vs 11,686 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 36% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $6,199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $821 |
| -$8.83 | Daily net profit | -$8.22 |
| -$9,422 | Net after 1 year | -$3,822 |
| -$12,646 | Net after 2 years | -$6,822 |
| -$15,869 | Net after 3 years | -$9,822 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)184,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) is more profitable at $-8.22/day compared to $-8.83/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) runs at 184,000.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) runs at 360,526.3 J/TH — a difference of 176,526.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficacité (184,000 vs 360,526 J/TH).