Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Goldshell LT5 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) | Specification | Goldshell LT5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.5 GH/s |
| 3,680 W | Consommation électrique | 3,100 W |
| 184,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,265,306.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 12,556 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)
Goldshell LT5 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 716% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)'s favour. The Goldshell LT5 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) and Goldshell LT5 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 716% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell LT5 Pro 16% better power draw (3,680 vs 3,100 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 85% better efficacité (184,000 vs 1,265,306 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 19% more heat output (12,556 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 36% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) | Metric | Goldshell LT5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $6,199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $800 |
| -$8.83 | Daily net profit | -$7.44 |
| -$9,422 | Net after 1 year | -$3,516 |
| -$12,646 | Net after 2 years | -$6,231 |
| -$15,869 | Net after 3 years | -$8,947 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)184,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) or the Goldshell LT5 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell LT5 Pro is more profitable at $-7.44/day compared to $-8.83/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Goldshell LT5 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell LT5 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Goldshell LT5 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell LT5 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Goldshell LT5 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) runs at 184,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 Pro runs at 1,265,306.1 J/TH — a difference of 1,081,306.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (184,000 vs 1,265,306 J/TH).