Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) | Specification | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 420.0 MH/s |
| 3,680 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 184,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 952,381.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| — | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 12,556 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)
Goldshell Mini Doge II
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 4662% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)'s favour. The Goldshell Mini Doge II claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) and Goldshell Mini Doge II sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 4662% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 89% better power draw (3,680 vs 400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 81% better efficacité (184,000 vs 952,381 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) 820% more heat output (12,556 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 130% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) | Metric | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| $6,199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $258 |
| -$8.83 | Daily net profit | -$0.96 |
| -$9,422 | Net after 1 year | -$608 |
| -$12,646 | Net after 2 years | -$959 |
| -$15,869 | Net after 3 years | -$1,309 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini Doge IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)184,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) or Goldshell Mini Doge II more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini Doge II is more profitable at $-0.96/day compared to $-8.83/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) or the Goldshell Mini Doge II better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) or the Goldshell Mini Doge II?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L11 (20Gh) runs at 184,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini Doge II runs at 952,381.0 J/TH — a difference of 768,381.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (184,000 vs 952,381 J/TH).