Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 185.0 MH/s |
| 5,676 W | Consommation électrique | 233 W |
| 172,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,259,459.5 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 19,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 795 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Goldshell Mini-DOGE
Based on BTC price of $77,957 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 17738% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell Mini-DOGE holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Goldshell Mini-DOGE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 17738% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE 96% better power draw (5,676 vs 233 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 86% better efficacité (172,000 vs 1,259,459 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 2336% more heat output (19,367 vs 795 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 42% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE |
|---|---|---|
| $16,888 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $298 |
| -$13.62 | Daily net profit | -$0.56 |
| -$21,860 | Net after 1 year | -$502 |
| -$26,831 | Net after 2 years | -$706 |
| -$31,803 | Net after 3 years | -$910 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)172,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or Goldshell Mini-DOGE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-13.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell Mini-DOGE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell Mini-DOGE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Goldshell Mini-DOGE on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) runs at 172,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE runs at 1,259,459.5 J/TH — a difference of 1,087,459.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (172,000 vs 1,259,459 J/TH).