Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 33.0 GH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 5,676 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 172,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,367 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer AL1 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (210 vs 172,000 J/TH). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer AL1 48385% more hashrate (16.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer AL1 41% better power draw (3,360 vs 5,676 W)
- Antminer AL1 100% better efficacité (210 vs 172,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 69% more heat output (11,464 vs 19,367 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 22% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $16,888 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$13.62 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$21,860 |
| -$15,466 | Net after 2 years | -$26,831 |
| -$18,199 | Net after 3 years | -$31,803 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer AL1210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer AL1 is more profitable at $-7.49/day compared to $-13.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer AL1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) runs at 172,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 171,790.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (210 vs 172,000 J/TH).