Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS3 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 33.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 5,676 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 172,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,367 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS3
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer KS3 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (372 vs 172,000 J/TH). The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer KS3 28385% more hashrate (9.4 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer KS3 38% better power draw (3,500 vs 5,676 W)
- Antminer KS3 100% better efficacité (372 vs 172,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 62% more heat output (11,942 vs 19,367 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 22% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS3 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $8,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $16,888 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$13.62 |
| -$10,942 | Net after 1 year | -$21,860 |
| -$13,885 | Net after 2 years | -$26,831 |
| -$16,827 | Net after 3 years | -$31,803 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS3372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer KS3 or Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer KS3 is more profitable at $-8.06/day compared to $-13.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer KS3 vs Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer KS3 and Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) on J/TH?
The Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) runs at 172,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 171,627.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (372 vs 172,000 J/TH).