Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) | Specification | VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 9.2 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.2 GH/s |
| 3,425 W | Consommation électrique | 3,700 W |
| 373,908.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 228,395.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15,000.0 kg | Weight | 15.6 kg |
| 11,686 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,624 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | VOLCMINER |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 77% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) and VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 77% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 7% better power draw (3,425 vs 3,700 W)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 39% better efficacité (373,908 vs 228,395 J/TH)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 100% better weight (15,000.0 vs 15.6 kg)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 8% more heat output (11,686 vs 12,624 BTU/hr)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) | Metric | VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$8.22 | Daily net profit | -$8.88 |
| -$4,599 | Net after 1 year | -$3,241 |
| -$7,599 | Net after 2 years | -$6,482 |
| -$10,600 | Net after 3 years | -$9,723 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)228,395.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) or VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) is more profitable at $-8.22/day compared to $-8.88/day for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh): which fits a residential setup better?
The VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) and VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) runs at 373,908.3 J/TH while the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) runs at 228,395.1 J/TH — a difference of 145,513.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 39% better efficacité (373,908 vs 228,395 J/TH).