Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| 9.2 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 800.0 MH/s |
| 3,425 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 373,908.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 625,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 15,000.0 kg | Weight | 3.2 kg |
| 11,686 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1045% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)'s favour. The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 1045% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 85% better power draw (3,425 vs 500 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 40% better efficacité (373,908 vs 625,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 100% better weight (15,000.0 vs 3.2 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) 585% more heat output (11,686 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 182% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| $1,599 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$8.22 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$4,599 | Net after 1 year | -$937 |
| -$7,599 | Net after 2 years | -$1,375 |
| -$10,600 | Net after 3 years | -$1,813 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE IIIScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)373,908.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.16Gh) runs at 373,908.3 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 251,091.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficacité (373,908 vs 625,000 J/TH).