Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) vs Elphapex DG Hydro 1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) | Specification | Elphapex DG Hydro 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 17.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 20.0 GH/s |
| 3,570 W | Consommation électrique | 6,200 W |
| 210,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 310,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 25.0 kg |
| 12,181 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 21,154 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)
Elphapex DG Hydro 1
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 42% better power draw (3,570 vs 6,200 W). The Elphapex DG Hydro 1 holds the edge in hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) and Elphapex DG Hydro 1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 18% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 42% better power draw (3,570 vs 6,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 32% better efficacité (210,000 vs 310,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) 46% better weight (13.5 vs 25.0 kg)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 74% more heat output (12,181 vs 21,154 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 47% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) | Metric | Elphapex DG Hydro 1 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,380 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,459 |
| -$8.57 | Daily net profit | -$14.88 |
| -$6,507 | Net after 1 year | -$9,890 |
| -$9,634 | Net after 2 years | -$15,321 |
| -$12,761 | Net after 3 years | -$20,752 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG Hydro 1Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) or Elphapex DG Hydro 1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) is more profitable at $-8.57/day compared to $-14.88/day for the Elphapex DG Hydro 1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) vs Elphapex DG Hydro 1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Elphapex DG Hydro 1 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) or Elphapex DG Hydro 1?
The Elphapex DG Hydro 1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) and Elphapex DG Hydro 1 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (17Gh) runs at 210,000.0 J/TH while the Elphapex DG Hydro 1 runs at 310,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 100,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (210,000 vs 310,000 J/TH).