Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 23.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 1,541 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 67.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 6,600.0 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,258 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,172 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 64% more hashrate (14.0 vs 23.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 64% more hashrate (14.0 vs 23.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 12% better power draw (1,350 vs 1,541 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 31% better efficacité (96.4 vs 67.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 100% better weight (6.0 vs 6,600.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 14% more heat output (4,606 vs 5,258 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 111% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$2.87 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$1,048 |
| -$2,347 | Net after 2 years | -$2,096 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$3,144 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)Score: 59/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)67.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-2.87/day for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) runs at 67.0 J/TH — a difference of 29.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficacité (96.4 vs 67.0 J/TH).