Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 23.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,541 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 67.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 6,600.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,258 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 67.0 J/TH). The Antminer E9 Pro claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 624900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 23.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 30% better power draw (2,200 vs 1,541 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 67.0 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 6,600.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 43% more heat output (7,506 vs 5,258 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 43% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$2.87 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,048 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$2,096 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$3,144 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)67.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) is more profitable at $-2.87/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) runs at 67.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,759.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 67.0 J/TH).