Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Antminer T17
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Antminer T17 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.0 TH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 55.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Antminer T17
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer T17 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 186% more hashrate (14.0 vs 40.0 TH/s) in the Antminer T17's favour. The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in consommation électrique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Antminer T17 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer T17 186% more hashrate (14.0 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 39% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,200 W)
- Antminer T17 43% better efficacité (96.4 vs 55.0 J/TH)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 37% better weight (6.0 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer T17 63% more heat output (4,606 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T17 42% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Antminer T17 |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$3.84 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$1,402 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$2,803 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$4,205 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T17Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer T1755.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Antminer T17?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-3.84/day for the Antminer T17. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Antminer T17?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer T17 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Antminer T17?
The Antminer T17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Antminer T17?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Antminer T17 runs at 55.0 J/TH — a difference of 41.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (96.4 vs 55.0 J/TH).