Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer T17
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Antminer T17 |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 40.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 55.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Antminer T17
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer T17 edges it: 3 of 3 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 55.0 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Antminer T17 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer T17 1086857% more hashrate (0.0 vs 40.0 TH/s)
- Antminer T17 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 55.0 J/TH)
- Antminer T17 33% better weight (14.2 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer T17 110% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Antminer T17 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$3.84 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,402 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$2,803 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$4,205 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T17Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer T1755.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Antminer T17 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer T17 is more profitable at $-3.84/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer T17: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer T17: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer T17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer T17: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Antminer T17 runs at 55.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,771.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 55.0 J/TH).