Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Antminer S17+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Specification | Antminer S17+ |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 73.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 2,920 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,963 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 84/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)
Antminer S17+
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer S17+ l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 30% more hashrate (56.0 vs 73.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and Antminer S17+ diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer S17+ 30% more hashrate (56.0 vs 73.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 14% better power draw (2,520 vs 2,920 W)
- Antminer S17+ 11% better efficacité (45.0 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S17+ 100% better weight (9,500.0 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer S17+ 16% more heat output (8,598 vs 9,963 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17+ 282% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 84.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Metric | Antminer S17+ |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.03 | Daily net profit | -$4.38 |
| -$1,885 | Net after 1 year | -$1,599 |
| -$3,357 | Net after 2 years | -$3,198 |
| -$4,829 | Net after 3 years | -$4,797 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S17+40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Antminer S17+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) is more profitable at $-4.03/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Antminer S17+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or Antminer S17+?
The Antminer S17+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the Antminer S17+?
The Antminer S17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and Antminer S17+?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 5.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 11% better efficacité (45.0 vs 40.0 J/TH).