Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer S17+ is the stronger pick — it leads on 3 of 3 head-to-head factors. The Antminer AL1 runs 16.0 TH/s; the Antminer S17+ runs 73.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Antminer S17+ |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 73.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 2,920 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,963 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Antminer S17+
Based on BTC price of $60,447 and current network difficulty as of Jun 27, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer S17+ comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 3 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 81% better efficacité (210.0 vs 40.0 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer AL1 and Antminer S17+ sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S17+ 356% more hashrate (16.0 vs 73.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17+ 13% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,920 W)
- Antminer S17+ 81% better efficacité (210.0 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S17+ 34% better weight (14.5 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer AL1 15% more heat output (11,464 vs 9,963 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Antminer S17+ |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.61 | Daily net profit | -$4.94 |
| -$12,778 | Net after 1 year | -$1,802 |
| -$15,555 | Net after 2 years | -$3,603 |
| -$18,333 | Net after 3 years | -$5,405 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S17+40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17+: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17+ is more profitable at $-4.94/day compared to $-7.61/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17+: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer AL1 or Antminer S17+?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Antminer AL1 vs Antminer S17+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 170.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (210.0 vs 40.0 J/TH).