Antminer E9 Pro vs Antminer S17+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Antminer S17+ is the stronger pick — it leads on 2 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Antminer E9 Pro runs 3,680.0 MH/s; the Antminer S17+ runs 73.0 TH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Antminer S17+ |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 73.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 2,920 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 40.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 9.5 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,963 BTU/hr |
| 11/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Antminer S17+
Based on BTC price of $60,461 and current network difficulty as of Jun 27, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer S17+ edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1983596% more hashrate (0.0 vs 73.0 TH/s). The Antminer E9 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer E9 Pro and Antminer S17+ sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S17+ 1983596% more hashrate (0.0 vs 73.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 25% better power draw (2,200 vs 2,920 W)
- Antminer S17+ 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 40.0 J/TH)
- Antminer S17+ 33% better weight (14.2 vs 9.5 kg)
- Antminer S17+ 33% more heat output (7,506 vs 9,963 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 38% more score de minage domestique (11.0 vs 8.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Antminer S17+ |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$4.94 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,801 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$3,603 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$5,404 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 11/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S17+40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Antminer S17+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17+ is more profitable at $-4.94/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or the Antminer S17+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the Antminer S17+?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 11/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Antminer S17+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and Antminer S17+?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,786.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 40.0 J/TH).