Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer D9

Antminer D9

Taux de hachage 1,770.0 GH/s Puissance 2,839 W Efficiency 1,604.0 J/TH
VS
Antminer S17+

Antminer S17+

Taux de hachage 73.0 TH/s Puissance 2,920 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH

Antminer D9 vs Antminer S17+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer D9 Specification Antminer S17+
1,770.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 73.0 TH/s
2,839 W Consommation électrique 2,920 W
1,604.0 J/TH Efficiency 40.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
16.1 kg Weight 9.5 kg
9,687 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,963 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 84/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer D9

Daily Revenue 0.00000081 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$6.81
Daily Profit -$6.75
Monthly -$202.53
Yearly -$2,464.15

Antminer S17+

Daily Revenue 0.00003359 BTC $2.58
Daily Electricity -$7.01
Daily Profit -$4.43
Monthly -$132.89
Yearly -$1,616.82

Based on BTC price of $76,752 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer S17+, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 4024% more hashrate (1.8 vs 73.0 TH/s) in the Antminer S17+'s favour. The Antminer D9 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Antminer S17+ — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer D9 and Antminer S17+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer S17+ 4024% more hashrate (1.8 vs 73.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer D9 3% better power draw (2,839 vs 2,920 W)
  • Antminer S17+ 98% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 40.0 J/TH)
  • Antminer S17+ 41% better weight (16.1 vs 9.5 kg)
  • Antminer S17+ 3% more heat output (9,687 vs 9,963 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer S17+ 133% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 84.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Antminer D9 Metric Antminer S17+
$3,000 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$6.75 Daily net profit -$4.43
-$5,464 Net after 1 year -$1,617
-$7,928 Net after 2 years -$3,234
-$10,392 Net after 3 years -$4,850
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer S17+

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer S17+

40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Antminer D9 or the Antminer S17+?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17+ is more profitable at $-4.43/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer D9 or Antminer S17+?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Antminer D9 vs Antminer S17+: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer S17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer D9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer D9 and Antminer S17+?

The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,564.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (1,604.0 vs 40.0 J/TH).