Antminer S17+ vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17+ | Specification | Innosilicon T3+ 52T |
|---|---|---|
| 73.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 52.0 TH/s |
| 2,920 W | Consommation électrique | 2,800 W |
| 40.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 53.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 10,000.0 kg |
| 9,963 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,554 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17+
Innosilicon T3+ 52T
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer S17+ edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 40% more hashrate (73.0 vs 52.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon T3+ 52T claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer S17+ and Innosilicon T3+ 52T sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer S17+ 40% more hashrate (73.0 vs 52.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T 4% better power draw (2,920 vs 2,800 W)
- Antminer S17+ 26% better efficacité (40.0 vs 53.9 J/TH)
- Antminer S17+ 100% better weight (9.5 vs 10,000.0 kg)
- Antminer S17+ 4% more heat output (9,963 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S17+ 282% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 22.0)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17+Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer S17+40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S17+ or Innosilicon T3+ 52T more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer S17+ is more profitable at $-4.38/day compared to $-4.85/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S17+ or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer S17+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S17+ or Innosilicon T3+ 52T?
The Antminer S17+ scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S17+ vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S17+ runs at 40.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH — a difference of 13.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficacité (40.0 vs 53.9 J/TH).
Compare Antminer S17+ with...
Compare Innosilicon T3+ 52T with...
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T3+ 52T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator