Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 63.0 TH/s |
| 2,094 W | Consommation électrique | 3,276 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 52.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 12,800.0 kg |
| 7,145 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th), which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 36% better power draw (2,094 vs 3,276 W). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro 19% more hashrate (53.0 vs 63.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 36% better power draw (2,094 vs 3,276 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 24% better efficacité (39.5 vs 52.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 26% better weight (9,500 vs 12,800 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro 56% more heat output (7,145 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 18% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $780 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,150 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$5.60 |
| -$1,918 | Net after 1 year | -$3,192 |
| -$3,056 | Net after 2 years | -$5,234 |
| -$4,194 | Net after 3 years | -$7,277 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-5.60/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1146 Pro runs at 52.0 J/TH — a difference of 12.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficacité (39.5 vs 52.0 J/TH).