Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) vs Bolon Miner B11
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Specification | Bolon Miner B11 |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 70.0 TH/s |
| 2,094 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 39.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 47.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 7,145 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bolon Miner |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)
Bolon Miner B11
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th), which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 37% better power draw (2,094 vs 3,300 W). The Bolon Miner B11 claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Bolon Miner B11 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bolon Miner B11 32% more hashrate (53.0 vs 70.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 37% better power draw (2,094 vs 3,300 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 16% better efficacité (39.5 vs 47.1 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 17% better weight (9,500 vs 11,500 kg)
- Bolon Miner B11 58% more heat output (7,145 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) 18% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) | Metric | Bolon Miner B11 |
|---|---|---|
| $780 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$5.40 |
| -$1,918 | Net after 1 year | -$1,972 |
| -$3,057 | Net after 2 years | -$3,943 |
| -$4,195 | Net after 3 years | -$5,915 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th)39.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Bolon Miner B11?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-5.40/day for the Bolon Miner B11. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Bolon Miner B11 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) or the Bolon Miner B11?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bolon Miner B11). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) and Bolon Miner B11?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 Pro (53Th) runs at 39.5 J/TH while the Bolon Miner B11 runs at 47.1 J/TH — a difference of 7.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficacité (39.5 vs 47.1 J/TH).