Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs StrongU STU-U8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Specification | StrongU STU-U8 |
|---|---|---|
| 64.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 46.0 TH/s |
| 2,880 W | Consommation électrique | 2,100 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 10,500.0 kg | Weight | 8,200.0 kg |
| 9,827 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,165 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)
StrongU STU-U8
Based on BTC price of $77,994 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 39% more hashrate (64.0 vs 46.0 TH/s). The StrongU STU-U8 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) and StrongU STU-U8 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 39% more hashrate (64.0 vs 46.0 TH/s)
- StrongU STU-U8 27% better power draw (2,880 vs 2,100 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 1% better efficacité (45.0 vs 45.7 J/TH)
- StrongU STU-U8 22% better weight (10,500 vs 8,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 37% more heat output (9,827 vs 7,165 BTU/hr)
- StrongU STU-U8 18% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) | Metric | StrongU STU-U8 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,149 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.61 | Daily net profit | -$3.39 |
| -$6,833 | Net after 1 year | -$1,237 |
| -$8,518 | Net after 2 years | -$2,474 |
| -$10,202 | Net after 3 years | -$3,711 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
StrongU STU-U8Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) or StrongU STU-U8 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the StrongU STU-U8 is more profitable at $-3.39/day compared to $-4.61/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs StrongU STU-U8: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) vs StrongU STU-U8: which fits a residential setup better?
The StrongU STU-U8 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) and StrongU STU-U8 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U8 runs at 45.7 J/TH — a difference of 0.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficacité (45.0 vs 45.7 J/TH).