Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 64.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 2,880 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 10,500.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,827 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)
Based on BTC price of $77,048 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 79% better efficacité (210.0 vs 45.0 J/TH). That said, the Antminer AL1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 300% more hashrate (16.0 vs 64.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 14% better power draw (3,360 vs 2,880 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) 79% better efficacité (210.0 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 10,500.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 17% more heat output (11,464 vs 9,827 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,149 |
| -$7.50 | Daily net profit | -$4.64 |
| -$12,736 | Net after 1 year | -$6,844 |
| -$15,473 | Net after 2 years | -$8,538 |
| -$18,209 | Net after 3 years | -$10,233 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) is more profitable at $-4.64/day compared to $-7.50/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S17e (64Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 165.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (210.0 vs 45.0 J/TH).