Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 95.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 1,280 W |
| 34.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 80.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,500.0 kg | Weight | 4,560.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,367 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 494% more hashrate (95.0 vs 16.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) and Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 494% more hashrate (95.0 vs 16.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 61% better power draw (3,250 vs 1,280 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 57% better efficacité (34.2 vs 80.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 69% better weight (14,500 vs 4,560 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) 154% more heat output (11,089 vs 4,367 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $215 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.38 | Daily net profit | -$2.50 |
| -$1,815 | Net after 1 year | -$911 |
| -$3,414 | Net after 2 years | -$1,822 |
| -$5,014 | Net after 3 years | -$2,734 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)34.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.50/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) or Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) and Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 (95Th) runs at 34.2 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH — a difference of 45.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 57% better efficacité (34.2 vs 80.0 J/TH).