Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon Mini 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 110.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 37.5 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 800 W |
| 29.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 33 dB |
| 13,200.0 kg | Weight | 8.4 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,730 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)
Canaan Avalon Mini 3
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 75% better power draw (3,250 vs 800 W). The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Canaan Avalon Mini 3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 193% more hashrate (110.0 vs 37.5 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 75% better power draw (3,250 vs 800 W)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 28% better efficacité (29.6 vs 21.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 100% better weight (13,200.0 vs 8.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) 306% more heat output (11,089 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 195% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon Mini 3 |
|---|---|---|
| $360 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $710 |
| -$3.84 | Daily net profit | -$0.57 |
| -$1,762 | Net after 1 year | -$918 |
| -$3,165 | Net after 2 years | -$1,127 |
| -$4,567 | Net after 3 years | -$1,335 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Mini 3Score: 65/100. 33 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Mini 321.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Canaan Avalon Mini 3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is more profitable at $-0.57/day compared to $-3.84/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is quieter at 33 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) or the Canaan Avalon Mini 3?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) and Canaan Avalon Mini 3?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 Pro (110Th) runs at 29.6 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 runs at 21.3 J/TH — a difference of 8.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 28% better efficacité (29.6 vs 21.3 J/TH).