Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 134.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 14.0 TH/s |
| 2,881 W | Consommation électrique | 1,372 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 9,830 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,681 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 857% more hashrate (134.0 vs 14.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) and Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 857% more hashrate (134.0 vs 14.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 52% better power draw (2,881 vs 1,372 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 78% better efficacité (21.5 vs 98.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 100% better weight (14.4 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) 110% more heat output (9,830 vs 4,681 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $483 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$2.09 | Daily net profit | -$2.79 |
| -$1,247 | Net after 1 year | -$1,083 |
| -$2,011 | Net after 2 years | -$2,101 |
| -$2,775 | Net after 3 years | -$3,119 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) is more profitable at $-2.09/day compared to $-2.79/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) or Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) vs Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (134Th/s) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH — a difference of 76.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficacité (21.5 vs 98.0 J/TH).