Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S7-LN
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S7-LN |
|---|---|---|
| 140.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.7 TH/s |
| 3,010 W | Consommation électrique | 697 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 258.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,500.0 kg | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 10,270 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,378 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)
Bitmain Antminer S7-LN
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th), which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 5085% more hashrate (140.0 vs 2.7 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)'s favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) and Bitmain Antminer S7-LN diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 5085% more hashrate (140.0 vs 2.7 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S7-LN 77% better power draw (3,010 vs 697 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 92% better efficacité (21.5 vs 258.2 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S7-LN 48% better weight (14,500 vs 7,500 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 332% more heat output (10,270 vs 2,378 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S7-LN 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S7-LN |
|---|---|---|
| $522 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.19 | Daily net profit | -$1.58 |
| -$1,320 | Net after 1 year | -$575 |
| -$2,119 | Net after 2 years | -$1,150 |
| -$2,917 | Net after 3 years | -$1,725 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S7-LNScore: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or Bitmain Antminer S7-LN more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN is more profitable at $-1.58/day compared to $-2.19/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or Bitmain Antminer S7-LN?
The Bitmain Antminer S7-LN scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) and Bitmain Antminer S7-LN on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S7-LN runs at 258.2 J/TH — a difference of 236.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 92% better efficacité (21.5 vs 258.2 J/TH).