Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.0 TH/s |
| 3,250 W | Consommation électrique | 1,280 W |
| 36.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 11,089 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,367 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)
Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 592% more hashrate (90.0 vs 13.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)'s favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) and Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) 592% more hashrate (90.0 vs 13.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 61% better power draw (3,250 vs 1,280 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) 63% better efficacité (36.1 vs 98.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 70% better weight (14,200 vs 4,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) 154% more heat output (11,089 vs 4,367 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $405 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$4.56 | Daily net profit | -$2.60 |
| -$2,070 | Net after 1 year | -$1,016 |
| -$3,734 | Net after 2 years | -$1,966 |
| -$5,399 | Net after 3 years | -$2,917 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)36.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) is more profitable at $-2.60/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S19j (90Th) runs at 36.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) runs at 98.5 J/TH — a difference of 62.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 63% better efficacité (36.1 vs 98.5 J/TH).