Antminer S19j vs Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S19j | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 235.0 TH/s |
| 3,100 W | Consommation électrique | 5,170 W |
| 34.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 30 dB |
| 13.0 kg | Weight | 15.4 kg |
| 10,577 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 17,640 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S19j
Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 161% more hashrate (90.0 vs 235.0 TH/s). That said, the Antminer S19j isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer S19j and Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd 161% more hashrate (90.0 vs 235.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S19j 40% better power draw (3,100 vs 5,170 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd 36% better efficacité (34.4 vs 22.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd 60% better noise (75.0 vs 30.0 dB)
- Antminer S19j 16% better weight (13.0 vs 15.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd 67% more heat output (10,577 vs 17,640 BTU/hr)
- Antminer S19j 65% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer S19j | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $2,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,599 |
| -$4.20 | Daily net profit | -$3.95 |
| -$3,533 | Net after 1 year | -$4,040 |
| -$5,066 | Net after 2 years | -$5,481 |
| -$6,599 | Net after 3 years | -$6,922 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S19jScore: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd22.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer S19j vs Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd is more profitable at $-3.95/day compared to $-4.20/day for the Antminer S19j. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S19j or the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Antminer S19j at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer S19j or Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd?
The Antminer S19j scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 51/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer S19j vs Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer S19j runs at 34.4 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 Pro Hyd runs at 22.0 J/TH — a difference of 12.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficacité (34.4 vs 22.0 J/TH).