Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs DragonMint T1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Specification | DragonMint T1 |
|---|---|---|
| 332.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.0 TH/s |
| 5,644 W | Consommation électrique | 1,480 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 92.5 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 6.0 kg |
| 19,257 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,050 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 48/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Halong Mining |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)
DragonMint T1
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 1975% more hashrate (332.0 vs 16.0 TH/s). That said, the DragonMint T1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and DragonMint T1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 1975% more hashrate (332.0 vs 16.0 TH/s)
- DragonMint T1 74% better power draw (5,644 vs 1,480 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 82% better efficacité (17.0 vs 92.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 27% better noise (55.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- DragonMint T1 53% better weight (12.8 vs 6.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 281% more heat output (19,257 vs 5,050 BTU/hr)
- DragonMint T1 9% more score de minage domestique (44.0 vs 48.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Metric | DragonMint T1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.60 | Daily net profit | -$2.98 |
| -$2,382 | Net after 1 year | -$1,086 |
| -$2,966 | Net after 2 years | -$2,173 |
| -$3,549 | Net after 3 years | -$3,259 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
DragonMint T1Score: 48/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or the DragonMint T1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is more profitable at $-1.60/day compared to $-2.98/day for the DragonMint T1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs DragonMint T1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the DragonMint T1 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs DragonMint T1: which fits a residential setup better?
The DragonMint T1 scores 48/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and DragonMint T1 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the DragonMint T1 runs at 92.5 J/TH — a difference of 75.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (17.0 vs 92.5 J/TH).