Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Specification | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| 332.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 137.0 GH/s |
| 5,644 W | Consommation électrique | 3 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.3 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | — |
| 19,257 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Intel |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Based on BTC price of $78,274 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 242236% more hashrate (332.0 vs 0.1 TH/s). The Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 242236% more hashrate (332.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (5,644.0 vs 2.5 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 7% better efficacité (17.0 vs 18.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) 226456% more heat output (19,257.3 vs 8.5 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) | Metric | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.59 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$2,378 | Net after 1 year | -$0 |
| -$2,957 | Net after 2 years | -$1 |
| -$3,537 | Net after 3 years | -$1 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)Score: 44/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-1.59/day for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) or the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (332Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH — a difference of 1.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (17.0 vs 18.3 J/TH).