Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain Antminer S23

Bitmain Antminer S23

Taux de hachage 318.0 TH/s Puissance 3,498 W Efficiency 11.0 J/TH
VS
Avalon A1566

Avalon A1566

Taux de hachage 185.0 TH/s Puissance 3,420 W Efficiency 18.5 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S23 vs Avalon A1566

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S23 Specification Avalon A1566
318.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 185.0 TH/s
3,498 W Consommation électrique 3,420 W
11.0 J/TH Efficiency 18.5 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
14.5 kg Weight 14.9 kg
11,935 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,669 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Canaan

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S23

Daily Revenue 0.00014634 BTC $11.44
Daily Electricity -$8.40
Daily Profit $3.05
Monthly $91.36
Yearly $1,111.56

Avalon A1566

Daily Revenue 0.00008513 BTC $6.66
Daily Electricity -$8.21
Daily Profit -$1.55
Monthly -$46.57
Yearly -$566.60

Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S23 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 72% more hashrate (318 vs 185 TH/s). The Avalon A1566 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer S23 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer S23 and Avalon A1566 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitmain Antminer S23 72% more hashrate (318 vs 185 TH/s)
  • Avalon A1566 2% better power draw (3,498 vs 3,420 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer S23 41% better efficacité (11.0 vs 18.5 J/TH)
  • Bitmain Antminer S23 3% better weight (14.5 vs 14.9 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer S23 2% more heat output (11,935 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitmain Antminer S23 Metric Avalon A1566
$4,999 Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,500
$3.05 Daily net profit -$1.55
-$3,887 Net after 1 year -$6,067
-$2,776 Net after 2 years -$6,633
-$1,664 Net after 3 years -$7,200
Takes ~4.5 years to pay back at current rates Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Bitmain Antminer S23

$4.60/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer S23

11.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S23 or the Avalon A1566?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 is more profitable at $3.05/day compared to $-1.55/day for the Avalon A1566. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitmain Antminer S23 or the Avalon A1566 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S23 or Avalon A1566?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S23 and Avalon A1566 on J/TH?

The Bitmain Antminer S23 runs at 11.0 J/TH while the Avalon A1566 runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 7.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 41% better efficacité (11.0 vs 18.5 J/TH).