Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 1,127 W | Consommation électrique | 1,077 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 3,845 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,675 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th)
Ebang Ebit E9
Based on BTC price of $78,128 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th), which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 83% more hashrate (11.5 vs 6.3 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th)'s favour. The Ebang Ebit E9 holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) and Ebang Ebit E9 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) 83% more hashrate (11.5 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9 4% better power draw (1,127 vs 1,077 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) 43% better efficacité (98.0 vs 171.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) 5% more heat output (3,845 vs 3,675 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $370 |
| -$2.29 | Daily net profit | -$2.36 |
| -$901 | Net after 1 year | -$1,231 |
| -$1,738 | Net after 2 years | -$2,092 |
| -$2,574 | Net after 3 years | -$2,952 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th)98.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) is more profitable at $-2.29/day compared to $-2.36/day for the Ebang Ebit E9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) or the Ebang Ebit E9?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (11.5Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 73.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (98.0 vs 171.0 J/TH).