Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 13.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 88.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,344 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,410 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 577% more hashrate (13.0 vs 88.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 577% more hashrate (13.0 vs 88.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 61% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,344 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 62% better efficacité (100.0 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 70% better weight (4,200 vs 14,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 157% more heat output (4,436 vs 11,410 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $596 |
| -$2.66 | Daily net profit | -$4.91 |
| -$1,036 | Net after 1 year | -$2,389 |
| -$2,007 | Net after 2 years | -$4,181 |
| -$2,978 | Net after 3 years | -$5,974 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)38.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) is more profitable at $-2.66/day compared to $-4.91/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 62.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (100.0 vs 38.0 J/TH).