Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Specification | Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP |
|---|---|---|
| 13.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 151.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,247 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,079 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1062% more hashrate (13.0 vs 151.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP 1062% more hashrate (13.0 vs 151.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 60% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,247 W)
- Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP 79% better efficacité (100.0 vs 21.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP 150% more heat output (4,436 vs 11,079 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Metric | Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $999 |
| -$2.66 | Daily net profit | -$2.45 |
| -$1,036 | Net after 1 year | -$1,893 |
| -$2,007 | Net after 2 years | -$2,787 |
| -$2,978 | Net after 3 years | -$3,681 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP is more profitable at $-2.45/day compared to $-2.66/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Bitcoin Miner S19j XP runs at 21.5 J/TH — a difference of 78.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (100.0 vs 21.5 J/TH).