Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| 13.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,980 W |
| 100.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 19.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 13,580 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)
MicroBT Whatsminer M61
Based on BTC price of $76,901 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 1438% more hashrate (13.0 vs 200.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT Whatsminer M61's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M61 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 1438% more hashrate (13.0 vs 200.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 67% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,980 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 80% better efficacité (100.0 vs 19.9 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M61 206% more heat output (4,436 vs 13,580 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) 3% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M61 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,200 |
| -$2.66 | Daily net profit | -$2.47 |
| -$1,036 | Net after 1 year | -$3,103 |
| -$2,007 | Net after 2 years | -$4,006 |
| -$2,978 | Net after 3 years | -$4,909 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M6119.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) vs MicroBT Whatsminer M61: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 is more profitable at $-2.47/day compared to $-2.66/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M61 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) or MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M61). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) and MicroBT Whatsminer M61?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (13Th) runs at 100.0 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M61 runs at 19.9 J/TH — a difference of 80.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficacité (100.0 vs 19.9 J/TH).