Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Canaan Avalon Mini 3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Specification | Canaan Avalon Mini 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 37.5 TH/s |
| 1,372 W | Consommation électrique | 800 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 21.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 33 dB |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 8.4 kg |
| 4,681 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,730 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Canaan Avalon Mini 3
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 78% better efficacité (98.0 vs 21.3 J/TH) in the Canaan Avalon Mini 3's favour. The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) claws back ground on rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Canaan Avalon Mini 3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 168% more hashrate (14.0 vs 37.5 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 42% better power draw (1,372 vs 800 W)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 78% better efficacité (98.0 vs 21.3 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 8.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 72% more heat output (4,681 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 110% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Metric | Canaan Avalon Mini 3 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $710 |
| -$2.79 | Daily net profit | -$0.57 |
| -$1,083 | Net after 1 year | -$918 |
| -$2,101 | Net after 2 years | -$1,127 |
| -$3,119 | Net after 3 years | -$1,335 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Mini 3Score: 65/100. 33 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Mini 321.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or Canaan Avalon Mini 3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is more profitable at $-0.57/day compared to $-2.79/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or Canaan Avalon Mini 3?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is quieter at 33 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or Canaan Avalon Mini 3?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Canaan Avalon Mini 3?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 runs at 21.3 J/TH — a difference of 76.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficacité (98.0 vs 21.3 J/TH).