Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)

Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)

Taux de hachage 18.0 TH/s Puissance 1,728 W Efficiency 96.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 50T

Innosilicon T3 50T

Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s Puissance 3,100 W Efficiency 62.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) vs Innosilicon T3 50T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) Specification Innosilicon T3 50T
18.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s
1,728 W Consommation électrique 3,100 W
96.0 J/TH Efficiency 62.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
5,150.0 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
5,896 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,577 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000828 BTC $0.65
Daily Electricity -$4.15
Daily Profit -$3.50
Monthly -$104.99
Yearly -$1,277.33

Innosilicon T3 50T

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$5.64
Monthly -$169.23
Yearly -$2,058.93

Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon T3 50T, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 178% more hashrate (18.0 vs 50.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Innosilicon T3 50T — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) and Innosilicon T3 50T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon T3 50T 178% more hashrate (18.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 44% better power draw (1,728 vs 3,100 W)
  • Innosilicon T3 50T 35% better efficacité (96.0 vs 62.0 J/TH)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 49% better weight (5,150 vs 10,000 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3 50T 79% more heat output (5,896 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3 50T

62.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) or the Innosilicon T3 50T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) or the Innosilicon T3 50T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) or the Innosilicon T3 50T?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3 50T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) vs Innosilicon T3 50T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) runs at 96.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH — a difference of 34.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 35% better efficacité (96.0 vs 62.0 J/TH).