Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 18.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,728 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 96.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 5,150.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,896 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 96.0 J/TH). The Antminer E9 Pro claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 489030% more hashrate (0.0 vs 18.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 21% better power draw (2,200 vs 1,728 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 96.0 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 5,150.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 27% more heat output (7,506 vs 5,896 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 43% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,277 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$2,554 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$3,832 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)96.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) runs at 96.0 J/TH — a difference of 597,730.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (597,826.1 vs 96.0 J/TH).