Antminer Slim Edition (S9) vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 1,100 W | Consommation électrique | 1,432 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 136.4 J/TH |
| 65 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.5 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,886 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 33% better efficacité (91.7 vs 136.4 J/TH) in the Antminer Slim Edition (S9)'s favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 14% more hashrate (12.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 23% better power draw (1,100 vs 1,432 W)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 33% better efficacité (91.7 vs 136.4 J/TH)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 100% better weight (3.5 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 30% more heat output (3,753 vs 4,886 BTU/hr)
- Antminer Slim Edition (S9) 68% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Slim Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $350 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $955 |
| -$2.21 | Daily net profit | -$3.06 |
| -$1,156 | Net after 1 year | -$2,071 |
| -$1,962 | Net after 2 years | -$3,188 |
| -$2,768 | Net after 3 years | -$4,304 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)Score: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer Slim Edition (S9)91.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is more profitable at $-2.21/day compared to $-3.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) or the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Slim Edition (S9) and Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) on J/TH?
The Antminer Slim Edition (S9) runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH — a difference of 44.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (91.7 vs 136.4 J/TH).