Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Whatsminer M50S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 160.0 TH/s |
| 1,541 W | Consommation électrique | 3,520 W |
| 67.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6,600.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 5,258 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,010 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)
Whatsminer M50S++
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Whatsminer M50S++ edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 596% more hashrate (23.0 vs 160.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) and Whatsminer M50S++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M50S++ 596% more hashrate (23.0 vs 160.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) 56% better power draw (1,541 vs 3,520 W)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 67% better efficacité (67.0 vs 22.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 100% better weight (6,600.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 128% more heat output (5,258 vs 12,010 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 7% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,000 |
| -$2.87 | Daily net profit | -$2.69 |
| -$1,048 | Net after 1 year | -$4,981 |
| -$2,095 | Net after 2 years | -$5,962 |
| -$3,143 | Net after 3 years | -$6,943 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50S++Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S++22.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) or Whatsminer M50S++ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S++ is more profitable at $-2.69/day compared to $-2.87/day for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Whatsminer M50S++: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M50S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) vs Whatsminer M50S++: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M50S++ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) and Whatsminer M50S++ on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T15 (23Th) runs at 67.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S++ runs at 22.0 J/TH — a difference of 45.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (67.0 vs 22.0 J/TH).