Antminer T17

Taux de hachage 40.0 TH/s Puissance 2,200 W Efficiency 55.0 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Taux de hachage 375.0 TH/s Puissance 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH

Antminer T17 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer T17	Specification	Auradine Teraflux AI3680
40.0 TH/s	Taux de hachage	375.0 TH/s
2,200 W	Consommation électrique	5,625 W
55.0 J/TH	Efficiency	15.0 J/TH
75 dB	Niveau de bruit	55 dB
9.5 kg	Weight	—
7,506 BTU/hr	BTU Output	19,193 BTU/hr
84/100	Home Mining Score	—
—	Release Year	—
SHA-256	Algorithme	SHA-256
Bitmain	Manufacturer	Auradine

Profitability Comparison

Electricity Rate:

$/kWh

Antminer T17

Daily Revenue 0.00001841 BTC $1.44

Daily Electricity -$5.28

Daily Profit -$3.84

Monthly -$115.20

Yearly -$1,401.60

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00017257 BTC $13.50

Daily Electricity -$13.50

Daily Profit $0.00

Monthly $0.00

Yearly $0.02

Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 838% more hashrate (40.0 vs 375.0 TH/s). The Antminer T17 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AI3680 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer T17 and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 sit on each measurable spec:

Auradine Teraflux AI3680 838% more hashrate (40.0 vs 375.0 TH/s)
Antminer T17 61% better power draw (2,200 vs 5,625 W)
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 73% better efficacité (55.0 vs 15.0 J/TH)
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
Auradine Teraflux AI3680 156% more heat output (7,506 vs 19,193 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

$3.84/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer T17

Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

15.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer T17 or Auradine Teraflux AI3680 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-3.84/day for the Antminer T17. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Antminer T17 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer T17 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Antminer T17 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which fits a residential setup better?

The Antminer T17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer T17 and Auradine Teraflux AI3680?

The Antminer T17 runs at 55.0 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 40.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficacité (55.0 vs 15.0 J/TH).

Compare Antminer T17 with...

Compare Auradine Teraflux AI3680 with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. Réparation ASIC 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.