Antminer S17 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer S17 | Specification | Auradine Teraflux AI3680 |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 375.0 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 5,625 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 15.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,193 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Auradine |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer S17
Auradine Teraflux AI3680
Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Auradine Teraflux AI3680 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 570% more hashrate (56.0 vs 375.0 TH/s). The Antminer S17 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer S17 and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 570% more hashrate (56.0 vs 375.0 TH/s)
- Antminer S17 55% better power draw (2,520 vs 5,625 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 67% better efficacité (45.0 vs 15.0 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Auradine Teraflux AI3680 123% more heat output (8,598 vs 19,193 BTU/hr)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer S17Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AI368015.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer S17 or Auradine Teraflux AI3680 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.58/day compared to $-4.42/day for the Antminer S17. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer S17 or the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer S17 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer S17 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer S17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AI3680). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer S17 and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 on J/TH?
The Antminer S17 runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 30.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (45.0 vs 15.0 J/TH).