Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Taux de hachage 600.0 TH/s Puissance 8,700 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
VS

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Taux de hachage 375.0 TH/s Puissance 5,625 W Efficiency 15.0 J/TH

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 Specification Auradine Teraflux AI3680
600.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 375.0 TH/s
8,700 W Consommation électrique 5,625 W
14.5 J/TH Efficiency 15.0 J/TH
60 dB Niveau de bruit 55 dB
Weight
29,684 BTU/hr BTU Output 19,193 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Auradine Manufacturer Auradine

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

Daily Revenue 0.00027144 BTC $17.46
Daily Electricity -$20.88
Daily Profit -$3.42
Monthly -$102.46
Yearly -$1,246.59

Auradine Teraflux AI3680

Daily Revenue 0.00016965 BTC $10.92
Daily Electricity -$13.50
Daily Profit -$2.58
Monthly -$77.54
Yearly -$943.37

Based on BTC price of $64,340 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 60% more hashrate (600 vs 375 TH/s). The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 claws back ground on consommation électrique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Auradine Teraflux AH3880 — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 and Auradine Teraflux AI3680 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 60% more hashrate (600 vs 375 TH/s)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 35% better power draw (8,700 vs 5,625 W)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 3% better efficacité (14.5 vs 15.0 J/TH)
  • Auradine Teraflux AI3680 8% better noise (60.0 vs 55.0 dB)
  • Auradine Teraflux AH3880 55% more heat output (29,684 vs 19,193 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Auradine Teraflux AH3880

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 or Auradine Teraflux AI3680 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is more profitable at $-2.58/day compared to $-3.42/day for the Auradine Teraflux AH3880. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Auradine Teraflux AI3680 is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Auradine Teraflux AH3880 at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

Auradine Teraflux AH3880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Auradine Teraflux AH3880 runs at 14.5 J/TH while the Auradine Teraflux AI3680 runs at 15.0 J/TH — a difference of 0.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficacité (14.5 vs 15.0 J/TH).